Middle East = Utopia, if only there were no Jews?!

In a report published this past Tues. the U. N. blamed the struggles and turmoil in the Middle East on the creation of the state of Israel, the discovery of Middle Eastern oil reserves, and the support of dictators by Cold War super powers. First off...what in the heck?!! Then, let me add fuel to this fire of idiocy, according to the AP the report goes on to state that , "the Israeli occupation of the territories and the US occupation of Iraq both created excuses for Arab governments to postpone democratization and they strengthened extremist groups which advocate violence." Yo, take a look around, please! Lebanon is kicking out Syrian troops and bullies. Iraq has had an election. Saudi Arabia had, albeit a small one, elections for the first time. Afghanistan has had elections and is soon to have more. Egypt is planning for elections. Palestinians held elections right next door!? Are these happening in spite of the negative influences stated above. Where are the excuses. If I read that correctly, the Middle East would have been entirely democratic and peaceful were it not for Israel and the U. S. Qhadafi would have just decided on his own to disarm and get rid of the WMD? Let us be completely logical, on the November 29, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a Jewish State in Israel, requiring the inhabitants of Israel to take such steps as were necessary on their part for the implementation of that resolution. So if the U. N. passed such a resolution, and the mid-East turmoil is partly blamed on the creation of the state of Israel, then would not the U. N. be as blameful as well?

Well, if it were not for Israel...
Let us continue with that theme. And, play an intellectual game we like to play at this blog, "what if?" What if there were no state of Israel in the Middle East. What if the powers that were reigned supreme before, during, and after the Second World War. For some it would have been, and probably still would be a nightmare. I once bought my father a book that was comprised of historical what-ifs. My following premise could be as scary. During the 1930's there was a man educated in Egypt and powerful in the British controlled Palestinian region of the Middle East (mainly what is today Israel). His name was Amin al-Husayni, and he was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during the Nationalist Party's rise in Germany. The Grand Mufti was anti-semitic through and through. It was rumored he began an anti-semitic club during his university time in Cairo. At the beginning of WW II al-Husayni began trying to make contact with Adolph Hitler. Historians report that the Grand Mufti wanted to help spread Nazi ideas throughout the Middle East. So, here we have it, a nut-job Mufti aligning himself with the Axis powers during WW II.
If Israel, or at the time Palestinian Jews, was not able to help the Allies, then a Nazi-welcoming Arab leader would have held sway over the region during WW II. Let us not forget the importance of this region for both sides...OIL. One could only imagine "the Bulge", with access to that much oil.

Short-sightedness, to say the least, and misdirected to be downright blunt. The U. N. report fails to lay any blame on those responsible for the violence and those teaching it to child after child. Instead it blames the authoritative governments on the only democratic state in the region, and on us for wanting to spread democracy. Someone needs to check the teacups over at the U. N., or else tell Rod Serling to stop giving these report writers ideas.