Karl Rove is the man, and Howard Dean may be a racist...

Two quotes have stood out in the news today and one seems to be making more waves than the other. Karl Rove speaking at a fundraiser in Manhattan, spoke of the feeling that most of us get when thinking of the democrat idea of fighting the war on terrorism. He said,"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers,". Was he wrong? Is he just flat out lying? Dennis Kucinich is a liberal check out his website. Kucinich seems to think we are the cause of terrorism because we make too much money and do not share. Michael Moore is a liberal remember what he said, click here. Moore seems to think that there is no terrorist threat, and Bush manipulated 9/11. It is not just the famous democrats or the leaders who speak of cajoling the terrorists, check out this thread from an online forum the day of the 9/11 attacks, click here. Karl Rove was not speaking some sort of blasphemy. The democrats are going to ask for an apology or for the President to distance himself from the remarks, but neither should happen. For one last example remember Congressman Jim McDermott, who seems to think we have not been attacked in 185 years. Uh, Congressman, do you remember Dec. 7th, 1941? To be honest, like Rove was being, the democrats do not even know who we are fighting. Rep. Rangel (d) from New York, does not even want to call it Islamic terrorism.

Keeping the above in mind, let us take a look at the ever useful dnc chairman Howie Dean and his latest remarks (this guy is a Godsend). Yesterday the lately, ever-present Dean suggested that the Republican party in Ohio were systematically hindering and obstructing the voting process for African-Americans. He said, "It's been widely reported over the past several years that Republicans do target African-Americans for voter suppression. It's very clear here while there was no massive voter fraud, and I concur with the conclusion — it's also clear that there was massive voter suppression," later having to rescind the idea of the fraud being Republican specific. After, their boy Howie, used the oft-used phrase that all liberals use to gin up conspiracies, "the appearance of impropriety". I love that, while it may not be illegal or they may not have actually seen a wrong-doing it sure has the appearance of impropriety. What the #$%# does that mean, really? Appearance of impropriety? One may be subjective enough to see anything as having an appearance of impropriety. Beyond that liberal cliche', let us take a closer look at ol' Doc' Dean's accusation. I do believe I hear some racism creeping in to his rhetoric. Is he suggesting that all African-Americans vote democrat, 100% of them? Last I heard the demographics suggest otherwise. That means Howie is being stereotypically ignorant, and non-multicultural. How can he just lump all African-Americans into one specific group. Either he can read minds or he is being just a tad uncaring at least, or racist at worst.

It is not too far-fetched to imagine that Dean's remarks will pass by the media without much of a wink, while Karl Rove's remarks on the other hand will have a spotlight shone upon them for days. It should not matter, for if we look back the White House advisor did not say democrats he used the word, "liberals". So, when all these members of Congress come out roaring and steaming, all they will be doing is identifying themselves as the true, pinko liberals that they are. They do not call him the architect for nothing.